8: Evaluate bids & select LSPs
Purpose
The purpose of this step is to evaluate received bids against predefined criteria, conduct negotiations, and select the preferred Logistics Service Providers (LSPs) – can be one or multiple depending on your logistics strategy and the sourcing results. This ensures a transparent, well-documented, and objective assessment process, aligning with your logistics needs.
Key activities
The key activities for this step include:
Conduct bid evaluations: Review and score proposals based on set criteria
Hold bid negotiations: Clarify terms and negotiate with shortlisted LSPs
Develop bid evaluation document: Summarize and compare bids to provide clear recommendations
Select preferred LSP(s): Finalize selection, notify all participants, and provide feedback
See detailed activity descriptions at the bottom of this page.
Key output
By completing Step 8, your organization will have thoroughly evaluated and selected the most appropriate LSP(s). Through transparent negotiations and careful assessment, this step ensures that your logistics goals are aligned with the capabilities of the chosen LSP(s). This process sets a strong foundation for the next phase – contracting – with clear justifications and internal consensus.
Supporting resources
-
Conduct bid evaluations
Once the bids have been received, assess the LSP proposals against predefined criteria such as cost, service quality, technological capabilities, geographical coverage, and flexibility. It is essential to involve a cross-functional team (e.g., logistics, IT, finance, legal) to ensure a thorough assessment.
Scoring system: Create a matrix with weighted criteria (e.g., 30% cost, 30% service quality, 20% flexibility, 20% innovation)
Evaluate technological compatibility: Ensure the LSP’s technological capabilities, such as warehouse management systems or tracking solutions, integrate smoothly with your organization’s systems
Evaluate long-term flexibility: Assess whether the LSP(s) can scale their services or adapt to new requirements over time, such as changes in demand or the introduction of new technology
Site visits & references: Direct interaction through site visits or meetings can provide valuable insights into LSP capabilities. Additionally, perform reference checks with the LSPs’ past clients to verify performance
Example: For a nationwide vaccine distribution contract, weigh cost savings against the provider’s experience in cold chain logistics and their ability to scale during emergencies
Internal discussions: Before finalizing scores, conduct internal discussions with key stakeholders to review preliminary evaluations and ensure alignment on priorities
Hiring a fourth-party logistics provider (4PL): When hiring a 4PL, pricing evaluation (aside from management costs) is less critical, as the 4PL will source competitive pricing from 2PLs/3PLs after they are contracted. Focus should be on their ability to manage the network and ensure transparency in vendor selection
Hold bid negotiations
After initial evaluations, negotiate terms with the shortlisted LSPs. Focus on refining the bids and addressing any concerns, such as cost, performance metrics, and terms of service.
Clarify terms & conditions: Ensure key terms, such as payment schedules, penalty clauses, and delivery guarantees, are clear. Seek flexibility where needed (e.g., handling emergencies, rapid scaling, and ensure continuation of services in unpredictable events like border closures or transport disruptions)
Leverage competition: Use the presence of multiple bidders to negotiate better terms
Internal review: After completing negotiations, consult with your legal, procurement, and logistics teams to ensure that the adjusted proposals align with internal policies and organizational expectations
Multi-stage negotiations: In complex logistics contracts, consider multi-stage negotiations to ensure alignment on both short- and long-term logistics goals
Develop bid evaluation document
To support decision-making, summarize the evaluation results in a bid evaluation document. This document should provide a clear comparison of each bid, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and alignment with logistics needs.
Structured comparison: Ensure your comparison is structured, listing key attributes (e.g., cost, service quality, compliance with the SoW) for each LSP
Bid evaluation matrix: Use an LSP bid evaluation matrix to organize and present comparisons systematically
Example: If LSP A is stronger on cost but weaker on service quality, the evaluation document should reflect how this factored into the final decision
Transparency & record-keeping: The bid evaluation document serves as a transparent record of the decision-making process, ensuring fairness and objectivity
Senior management review: Present the bid evaluation document to senior management for final approval before moving forward with the final selection
Select preferred LSP(s)
Based on the evaluation results, select the preferred LSP(s). This may involve choosing one provider or dividing services among multiple LSPs to capitalize on specific strengths.
Example: For a large distribution contract, you might select one provider for urban areas and another for rural locations with more complex logistics needs
Document the decision: Ensure the selection process is structured, transparent, and well-documented. Notify both successful and unsuccessful LSPs, providing feedback where appropriate to encourage future participation
Internal alignment: Involve key stakeholders in finalizing the decision to ensure alignment with organizational needs and policies
Clarify implementation timeline: Ensure that the LSP(s) provide a realistic timeline for service implementation, particularly for time-sensitive logistics operations. This timeline should include transition phases and deadlines for full operational capacity